Posts Tagged https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:2108&showbutton=true
Rechtbank Rotterdam held on 15 March last that 4 ships owned and operated by the Sea Trade concern had to be regarded as waste when they left the port at Rotterdam cq Hamburg (they were eventually beached in a variety of destinations). Not having been notified as waste, their shipment was considered illegal and the concern as well as some of its employees consequently convicted. (Illegal waste shipments being a criminal offense).
The court decided not to refer to the CJEU on the application of the waste definition to ships, as it considered the issue to be acte clair. The court’s review of the legal framework is included in Heading 4.3.4. As such, the analysis does not teach us much about the difficulty of applying the waste definition to international maritime logistics, in particular ship disposal. The court found at a factual level that the owners’ intention to dispose of the ships was clearly established when the ships left the EU, with, it suggested, the facts proving that the intention to dispose was at that moment of such an intensity as to trigger the waste definition.
The court does flag its appreciation for the difficulties. Not only is eventual disposal of hardware such as ships a possibility from the moment of their purchase. Such intention may also be withdrawn, reinstated, modified, at various moments of the ships’ life, fluctuating with market circumstances. Particularly given the criminal nature of the legal discipline here, I find that a very important driver to tread very cautiously and to look for firmer objective factors to establish intent.
Most probably to be continued on appeal.
(Handbook of ) EU Waste law, 2nd ed. 2017, para 1.20 ff. Disclosure: I acted as court expert.
Basel, definition, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:210, EVOA, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Convention, https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/inziendocument?id=ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:2108&showbutton=true, Rotterdam, Seatrade, ships, Trade, Waste, Waste shipments, Waste shipments Regulation, Zoekresultaat - inzien document ECLI:NL:RBROT:2018:210
- Bobek AG in Salvoni v Fiermonte. Brussels Ia’s Article 53 certificate and consumer protection. 11/06/2019
- The internet’s not written in pencil, it’s written in ink. Szpunar AG in Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook, re i.a. jurisdiction and removal of hate speech. (As well as confirming my reading of his Opinion in Google). 07/06/2019
- The CJEU in Weil: assessment of the scope of application of Brussels Ia at the A53 certificate stage; and a narrow reading of the matrimonial exception. 06/06/2019
- CeDe Group v KAN. Bobek AG on the intricate applicable law provisions of the Insolvency Regulation (here: concerning set-off). 04/06/2019
- Call for papers with tight deadline. Macao Writers’ Workshop for Early-Career Environmental Law Scholars. 03/06/2019
Also of noteMy Tweets