Posts Tagged  EWHC 4222
‘Extraterritorial’ application of EU cosmetics Regulation’s ban on animal testing. High Court refers to the ECJ.
Update 17 March 2016 Bobek AG Opined today.
The EU’s cosmetics Regulation prohibits the placing on the market of products tested on laboratory animals. Application of the (criminally enforced) UK implementing regulations, raised questions on the precise scope of the Regulation’s provisions which are aimed at preventing the simple circumvention of the Regulation via production abroad. (Rosalind English has excellent review here). The case at issue concerns the question whether products may incorporate ingredients tested outside the EU, where this testing has been carried out with a view to meeting the product regulation requirements of third States. It is known at the CJEU as Case C-592/14.
The room for circumvention of the EU regime is obvious. The limits to the EU’s territorial reach likewise. International trade law is not at issue in the case however it is clear that the eventual ECJ ruling will feed into WTO et al discussions on so-called ‘non-product incorporated production processes and -methods’.
Similar discussions were at issue in Zuchtvieh-Export, Case C-424/13, on the application of EU rules with respect to animal welfare to transport taking place outside of the EU.
Animal cruelty, Animal testing, Animal Welfare, Animals, Attorney General, C-592/14, Case C-424/13., CJEU, Cosmetics, Domestic regulatory autonomy, EU, EUROPEAN FEDERATION FOR COSMETIC INGREDIENTS, European Federation for Cosmetic Ingredients v Secretary of State for Business, extraterritorial, Extraterritoriality, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:342:0059:0209:en:PDF, http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2014/4222.html, Innovation and Skills, non-product-related production processes and -methods, nPr-PPMs, production processes and -methods, Regulation 1223/2009, Zuchtvieh-Export., Zuchtvieh-Transport,  EWHC 4222
- R v P: Szpunar AG confirms the absence of a general forum non conveniens rule in EU law. 23/08/2019
- Tibor v DAF: CJEU confirms markets affected by cartel as locus damni for end-users. 22/08/2019
- Dinant Bar v maître JN. Bar membership fees. Saugmansdgaard ØE on whether they are at all ‘civil and commercial’ and if so, whether they are ‘contractual’. 21/08/2019
- Koza v Akcil: The UK Supreme Court does not follow Court of Appeal on exclusive jurisdiction for company matters. 15/08/2019
- Politus BV. The Nyrstar (Belgium) scheme of arrangement’s jurisdictional confirmation. 13/08/2019
Also of noteMy Tweets